, the Swordsmiths and Armorers Guild, whose patron saint was the legendary warrior.
Donatello portrayed St. George with his feet spread apart, as this was the typical stance for a soldier in armor. In order to support the wide stance of the saint, Donatello included a large shield between his legs. This shield had the double purpose of supporting the statue and making it clear that the work was commissioned by weapon makers.
stands confidently and his muscles can be seen through his breastplate. His cloak is tied on the right side of his chest, but his head turns to the left, adding liveliness to the sculpture. Motion is not the intention of the statue, however. Donatello intended to produce a rigid and ready
who still seems relaxed and unafraid, as these are the characteristics of a good warrior saint.
has been moved several times. It was carved for and first stood in the niche belonging to the
on the north facade of Orsanmichele. A bas-relief at the base of this niche was carved with the scene of George Slaying the Dragon specifically to enhance the statue. Due to weathering concerns, the
was moved sometime between 1677 and 1700 to a niche on the south façade (originally containing the Madonna of the Rose), which is deeper and more protective than the one for Donatello’s sculpture. In about 1860, the statue was returned to its original niche, but by 1868 it was moved back again to the one intended for the Madonna of the Rose. In 1887,
, along with a plaster copy of its tabernacle, was installed inside the Bargello Museum, where it remains on display today.
Bibliography
Johnson, Geraldine Anne. “In the Eye of the Beholder: Donatello’s Sculpture in the Life of Renaissance Italy.” PhD diss., Harvard University, 1994: 186
Nethersole, Scott.
. London: Laurence King, 2019: 81
Partridge, Loren.
. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2009: 24
Poeschke, Joachim.
. Harry N. Abrams, 1990: 21, 380
Pope-Hennessy, John.
. Abbeville Press, 1993: 47
Zervas, Diane Finiello. “‘Degno Templo e Tabernacol Santo:’ Remembering and Renewing Orsanmichele.”
76 (2012): 9-11
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Page: https://3d.wlu.edu/v21/pages/Orsanmichele/orsanmichele.html
Location of Annotation: -26.01, 33.01, 1.90
Camera Location: -23.872, 25.955, 2.817
Camera Looks Towards: -33.408, 58.979, 5.685
Annotation block name: Donatello’s
A key development in sculptural style during the early 1400s is the rendition of cloth and draperies. When designing his sculpture of
St. John the Baptist between 1412 and 1414, Ghiberti employed an approach to textile representation dominated by full and sweeping folds that fall laterally across the body in heavy curves. The body of the saint is almost invisible below its clothes. By contrast, the body of Donatello’s
St. Mark shows through its clothes, privileging the anatomically accurate human form underneath. The naturalistic rendering of the saint’s clothes found form through a gentle and convincing approach to the folds of fabric that fall toward his ankles. Moreover, Ghiberti’s
St. John the Baptist stands in the traditional S-curve pose, a choice eschewed by Donatello in his
St. Mark. The
contrapposto position now replaces the S-curve, allowing the statue to stand naturally and comfortably while conserving a commanding air. The
contrapposto position refers to classical antecedents, a mainstay of Renaissance art, and announces Donatello’s decisive turn away from the Gothic style of his contemporaries.
Another way
St. Mark breaks from the Gothic tradition is through its placement in the niche. Unlike those sculptures that came before it at Orsanmichele, which use the space of the niche for compositional support, Donatello’s figure does not depend upon its niche for full effect. Instead of being contained by its niche,
St. Mark break free from it.
Neither artists, patrons nor viewers were thinking about distinctions between “Gothic” art and an emerging “Renaissance” alternative when these statues were produced in the early fifteenth century. Neither of these modern terms had been invented yet and would only come into academic parlance by scholars in the 1800s. Instead, contemporary viewers likely recognized distinctions between these two approaches but surely valued each as a different but equally effective rendition of the human form.
Bibliography
Lord Balcarres.
Donatello. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1903: 37
Bertelà, Giovanna Gaeta.
Donatello. The Library of Great Masters. Florence: Istituto Fotografico Editoriale, 1991: 8, 10
Poeschke, Joachim.
Donatello and His World: Sculpture of the Italian Renaissance. Harry N. Abrams, 1990: 19
Rosenauer, Artur. “Orsanmichele: The Birthplace of Modern Sculpture.”
Studies in the History of Art 76 (2012): 171
Turner, A. Richard.
Renaissance Florence: The Invention of a New Art. Edited by Harvey Jacky Colliss. New York: Harry N. Abrams, 1997: 56
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Page: https://3d.wlu.edu/v21/pages/Orsanmichele/orsanmichele.html
Location of Annotation: -25.52, 33.28, 6.54
Camera Location: -25.133, 23.404, 2.714
Camera Looks Towards: -21.875, 45.548, 6.256
Annotation block name: Donatello’s
St. Mark - General
Annotation Details:
Donatello’s
St. Mark from the Orsanmichele sculptural program was commissioned by the
Arte dei Linaiuoli e Rigattieri, the Linen Weavers’ and Pedlars’ Guild. The sculpture was installed in 1415, but by 1409 the guild had already ordered the marble for the statue. However, the sculptor, Donatello, was not selected until 1411. The statue is 7’10 high and is placed within a niche on the southwest pier of Orsanmichele’s exterior.
Donatello subtly referred to the corporate patrons of the sculpture by carving a stone “linen pillow” for the saint to stand on, a witty reminder of the guild’s presence in Florence. The addition of the pillow connected
St. Mark to the
Arte dei Linaiuoli e Rigattieri but also allowed Donatello to further emphasize his skill as a sculptor. Although made of stone, the linen pillow looks plush and soft, and it sinks beneath the weight of St. Mark’s body as though a real person were standing on it. Donatello’s ability to depict a pillow in this manner demonstrated his recognition of the ways in which forms interact with each other and how to depict these effects naturalistically.
St. Mark notably stands in a contrapposto stance. By putting his weight on his right leg,
St. Mark’s whole body becomes engaged. His pelvis tilts, his right shoulder dips, and his relaxed left leg bends at the knee. Mark’s torso and neck gently twist, while his right arm hangs to his side and his left arm lifts up with the hand holding his gospel text. As with the pillow, the saint’s hands and feet are carved with great naturalism, and his thick eyebrows and deep-set eyes give the saint an unmistakable character. All of these features come together in a highly naturalistic sculpture inspired by the classical tradition. Donatello’s skill as an artist becomes even more profound when the proportions of the statue are studied: the sculptor intentionally distorted the length of the figure’s torso in order to address the optical correction that occurs when the sculpture is viewed from below, the angle from which the statue was (and is) actually seen.
Bibliography
Bertelà, Giovanna Gaeta.
Donatello. The Library of Great Masters. Florence: Istituto Fotografico Editoriale, 1991: 8
Johnson, Geraldine Anne. “In the Eye of the Beholder: Donatello’s Sculpture in the Life of Renaissance Italy.” PhD diss., Harvard University, 1994: 182
Nethersole, Scott.
Art of Renaissance Florence: A City and Its Legacy. London: Laurence King, 2019: 80
Partridge, Loren.
Art of Renaissance Florence, 1400-1600. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2009: 22-3
Poeschke, Joachim.
Donatello and His World: Sculpture of the Italian Renaissance. Harry N. Abrams, 1990: 21, 377
Pope-Hennessy, John.
Donatello: Sculptor. Abbeville Press, 1993: 38, 40
Turner, A. Richard.
Renaissance Florence: The Invention of a New Art. Edited by Harvey Jacky Colliss. New York: Harry N. Abrams, 1997: 54-6
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Page: https://3d.wlu.edu/v21/pages/Orsanmichele/orsanmichele.html
Location of Annotation: -25.15, 33.68, 4.42
Camera Location: -26.130, 23.431, 2.929
Camera Looks Towards: -24.462, 73.807, 10.702
Annotation block name: Viewership of Donatello’s
St. Mark and
St. George
Annotation Details:
Florentine public sculpture changed dramatically during the first quarter of the fifteenth century. At this time, sculptures such as Donatello’s St. Mark and St. George begin to intentionally engage with the people who see them through their powerful, direct, and anatomically accurate bodily positions.
The positioning of Donatello’s St. Mark makes it clear that the saint focuses his attention on the to the east. Lay pedestrians could not ignore the gaze of St. Mark. Along with his face and body, people would notice the softness of the saint’s garments and the cushion on which the statue stands, a direct reminder of the fabrics crafted by the influential Arte dei Linaiuoli e Rigattieri, the Linen Weavers and Pedlars Guild, who commissioned the work.
Vasari writes that when guild members first saw Donatello’s completed St. Mark at ground level, they were disappointed with its “inaccurate” proportions: and, in fact, the elongated torso does not match the shorter legs below. Donatello told them he would fix it, but instead of altering the statue, he elevated it on a pedestal in a way that replicated the height of the niches in Orsanmichele. When Donatello revealed his sculpture to his patrons for the second time, the guild members were satisfied. Vasari probably invented this story to demonstrate a point: that St. Mark’s position in relation to the viewer dictated decisions that Donatello made while designing the figure.
Donatello’s inventive use of perspective in the bas relief at the eye level of viewers encouraged Florentines to imagine a spatial box that receded back into the depths of the landscape he created. At the same time, the spear, sword, or banner that appears to have been clutches in George’s hand jutted out over their heads into the street, effectively ‘breaking the fourth wall’ by penetrating the viewer’s space. Thus a back-and-forth, tug-and-pull effect caused spectators to understand themselves occupying a position within the same area as that depicted by the sculptor.
Bibliography
Johnson, Geraldine Anne. “In the Eye of the Beholder: Donatello’s Sculpture in the Life of Renaissance Italy.” PhD diss., Harvard University, 1994: 182-3, 185, 187
Nethersole, Scott. Art of Renaissance Florence: A City and Its Legacy. London: Laurence King, 2019: 80-1
Partridge, Loren. Art of Renaissance Florence, 1400-1600. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2009: 22-3
Turner, A. Richard. Renaissance Florence: The Invention of a New Art. Edited by Harvey Jacky Colliss. New York: Harry N. Abrams, 1997: 51
\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\